Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/21802
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Гурак, Ігор Федорович | - |
dc.contributor.author | Супрун, Віталій | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T07:19:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T07:19:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Чернівці: Чернівецький національний університет, 2024. – Т. 50. – С. 69-78 | uk_UA |
dc.identifier.other | DOI: 10.31861/mhpi2024.50.69-78 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/21802 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Law of Ukraine “On the Fundamentals of National Security”, the National Security Strategy of Ukraine, the Military Doctrine of Ukraine, and the Strategic Defense Bulletin, adopted during Viktor Yanukovych's presidency, adequately highlighted the military-political threats and challenges associated with Russia's actions. However, in seeking ways to counter these threats, the political leadership of that time declared a non-aligned status while simultaneously pursuing deeper European integration and maintaining strategic partnership with Russia. This situation is paradoxical from several perspectives. First and foremost, in the context of the crisis in the international security system and the weakening of international security institutions, the decision to transition to a “non-aligned” status was undoubtedly misguided. Even more absurd was this decision in light of the concurrent systemic reduction in the size of Ukraine's armed forces, decreased funding, disbanding of combat-ready units, weakening of the mobilization system of the Armed Forces, and other similar developments. In the context of countering regional threats, Ukrainian strategic security documents proposed steps aimed at addressing the militarization of the Central European and Black Sea-Caspian regions, at preventing the legitimization of quasi-state entities in the region, and enhancing Ukraine's role as a participant in resolving “frozen” conflicts in the European part of the post-Soviet space, among others. While recognizing the relevance of these objectives, it must be stated that official Kyiv lacked the necessary resources to influence these processes effectively. Overall, the strategic security documents of Viktor Yanukovych's presidency sufficiently identified the military-political challenges and threats associated with Russia's actions. However, Russia itself was not explicitly identified as the source of these threats and challenges. Moreover, no concrete measures were proposed to counter the outlined challenges and threats. Most importantly, there was no practical action undertaken to significantly improve the security situation either within Ukraine or along its borders. | uk_UA |
dc.language.iso | uk_UA | uk_UA |
dc.publisher | Чернівецький національний університет імені Юрія Федьковича | uk_UA |
dc.subject | Ukraine, national security, military-political threats, Russia, foreign policy | uk_UA |
dc.title | Російський контекст воєнно-політичних загроз і викликів для національної безпеки України за часів президентства Віктора Януковича | uk_UA |
dc.title.alternative | The Russian Context of Military-Political Threats and Challenges to Ukraine's National Security during Viktor Yanukovych's Presidency | uk_UA |
dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
Appears in Collections: | Статті та тези (ФІПМВ) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ihor Hurak (2024). Vitalii Suprun_The Russian Context of Military-Political Threats.pdf | 587.03 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.